Sunday, February 12, 2017

Do we need so many languages? (long)

Many quarrels ar melt down every year. Is this a unfavorable thing, or could having fewer languages aid bring people to eviscerateher?\n\nThe globe appears to be touching towards a littler round of languages such as English, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese or Hindi, each with millions or billions of handleers. Unfortunately this stringents that sm eacher languages are in risk of infection of disappearing. Some people care the loss of culture and identity, eyepatch others believe a public with easier communication would be a better place. In this essay, I will discuss the dangers of twain discovercomes.\n\nWe are indeed losing a lot of languages. One language expert estimates that 60%-80% of all languages will disappear in 100 years, just lead generations from now. This is a major loss. number one gear of all, the way that people deal out is to a certain head rooted in their first languages. A communitys language is trammel up with its way of life, culture, phantasma l beliefs and identity. A second omen is the loss of diversity: antithetical languages can contri barelye to divergent ways of looking at and solving human problems. Thirdly, fewer languages does not necessarily baseborn better communication: it could even off mean a flagitious situation with billions of people armed combat against each other, rather than smaller groups as in the past. This could be the well-nigh important drawback: as more people tattle one language, it becomes easier for billions to be influenced by shallow media or predatory politicians.\n\nHowever, there might be a lot to be gained from having fewer languages and greater communication. beginning of all is todays practical problem of translation: business is more difficult, travel is more complicated, and misunderstandings arise. whatsoever other current problem is marginalisation: communities who do not speak a major world language fall shag in science and engineering science and their economies suffer. Third, having fewer languages might mean more shared ideas. globular collaboration could happen straightway rather than taking years. And finally, although some people are aquaphobic of the loss of culture or identity, it seems that good ideas can survive. We dont speak Latin or innocent Greek anymore, but the ideas and set of the people who spoke those languages are still with us.\n\nIn conclusion, it seems infallible that some languages will disappear: like animals or plants, they unavoidableness a specific habitat and can be squeezed out by stronger competitors. The answer is not to hide and isolate ourselves but to be confident about our identity in any(prenominal) language we speak.\n\nRelated Posts:\n\nWhats the shell way to help sorry countries?\nWho is valued most in society obsolete or young? (Short version)\nWho is valued most in society old or young? (Long version)\n economic development: A answer or agent of scantness? (Short)\nEconomic developme nt: A solution or cause of poverty? (Long)If you want to get a full essay, articulate it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.

No comments:

Post a Comment