Monday, February 25, 2019
Illegal Immigration and enforcement of laws Essay
America, as we inhabit it today, is a melting pot of more nationalities, cultures, races, ethnic backgrounds, and religious pursuits. This is the closure of the early massive immigration to American shores from countries across the globe seek a newfangled life inside the borders of the unify States. This dream has non waned despite the march of meter, with individuals coming from all walks of life, striving to fulf trial their dreams of offset a new life for themselves and their families in the unite States, or to localize them financial support to alleviate the living conditions of their loved is abroad. merely new-fashi sensationd whiles and level(p)ts crap turned the once open gates for these immigrants to decision windows of opportunity as the unify States gives some of the harshest up dutynesss primed to keep dirty immigrants from ever setting foot on American soil. The latest theater for the enforcement of fair plays regarding the entry and stay of nonl egal immigrants in the unite States is in the republic of genus genus Arizona. Arizona Senate Bill 1070, the new debatable statute that empowers the jurisprudence in the verbalize to demand for the papers of any individual that they believe to have dirtyly entered the join States.Some of the virtue of natures main advocates intromit the chief of the Maricopa police department, Joe Arpaio and Russell Pearce, the chief sponsor of the bill in the state Senate. Pearce has a soulfulnessal angle to work for the strict enactment of the bill-Pearces son was shot to death by an nonlegal immigrant (Nathan Thornburgh). As Arizona Goernor Jan Brewer affixed his signature to the controversial bill, enacting the same into police within the borders of the state, critics and opp adeptnts of the handbill guaranteed that the measures conversion into law impart be met with stiff opposition.Many of the opp unrivallednts of the bill omend stiff legal sanctions and sparing boycotts pois ed to train their guns at Arizona, an reddent that the state can ill afford as the state is still in the morass of the lodging sector collapse that has buffeted the economy of the unite States. In the moments forrader the bill was signed, protesters and police clashed in a rally that has take to youngster clashes with authorities, with more than 1,500 people chanting, praying, criticizing or praising Brewer as he began to enact the law.Four of the protesters were taken into custody, after engaging police in a bottle throwing battle, with authorities clad in riot deliver (Craig Harris, Alia Beard Rau and Glen Creno). The Republican governor is faced with a vigorous argufy in the primaries and entrust need the support of the Conservative bloc to acquit on to her office, advancered that the new statute is one of the new instruments that the state will use in addressing the crisis that they were not responsible in creating, and stated that the federal political relation has ref apply to address this fill in at their level.The new legislation has effectuate Arizona squ arly in the national spotlight, with no less than United States President weighing in on the matter and CNN broadcasting the sign language of the law by Brewer live (Harris, Rau and Creno). In the opinion of Dr. George Weissinger, Ph. D. , the conundrum with the ill-gotten immigrants coming through the widely porous border regions of the United States with its southern neighbor is a dilemma that is not confined to the line with U. S.-Mexico immigration occupations, and opines that the enforcement of the present set of immigration laws by the United States government only contributes to the ever-increasing hot immigrant population of the United States. Weissinger (2003) argues that much of the societal perceptions of the illegitimate alien in the United States vary from the sympathetic to the bigoted. With this type of awe on the response of the association to the true plight of the vicious immigrants get in the United States, the responses as mentioned above atomic number 18 to be expected (Weissinger).What is considered to be a prime catalyst in the formation of the opinions of the society against or for the illegitimate immigrants is the media the media usually characterizes the wrong alien as one who crosses over the border of his own country to the next, with nothing more spurring him/her on than the possibility of being able to find a means of workout that will allow them to fend for their families back in their own congenital lands.But with the events that occurred that tragic day on the 11th of September, 2001, the image of the illegal alien has radically been transformed. The media is a powerful conveyor of the way that the illegal immigrant is portrayed in American or any other society. When the countersign broadcast images of immigrant day laborers, this image will serve as the type by which society deems what it defines to be the image of the illegal aliens in the society (Weissinger).Many of these characterizations are more inclined on the aesthetics quite than the economic, health or issues that write out with conflicts with the law. Many residents in the area that illegal immigrant congregate usually fear a decrease in their property values, or even some have the notion that the illegal immigrants exponent stupefy a hindrance to their business activities. These illegal immigrants flock to many locations in the United States where they hope that potential employers will ask them for the day, and then allowing them to send some financial aid to their families back home.But even without the Arizona and calcium laws, there is ample laws provided to the Federal government to deal with the problem of illegal immigrants (Weissinger). The in-migration and Naturalization Service (INS), downstairs patronage 8 USC Section 1357, has appointed officers and other psychenel to implement the law on illegal immigrants , allowing them the mandate to question suspected illegal immigrants with regards to their act stay in the United States, even without the benefit and requirement of a warrant.But unfortunately, the agency has been remiss in this duty to address this problem even before the enactment of the controversial Arizona statute. In the in operation(p) policy of the INS, now officially known as the Bureau of in-migration and Customs Enforcement (BICE), the target of the body is not the illegal immigrants themselves, but the employers who hire these illegal immigrants, removing the demand, and not the supply, in an effort to discourage illegal immigrants from coming to the United States to find employment.These operating policies developed as a final result of the implementation of the 1986 in-migration Reform and Control Act (Weissinger). But Arizona is not alone among the states of the Union trying to address their problems with regards to the burgeoning number of illegal aliens in their states. The Washington Times, known as a conservative publication, has belatedly reported that the illegal immigrant statute in California is akin to the one being enacted and implemented in Arizona.The Post reports that in the Penal engrave of California, section 834b, states that California law enforcement units should fully cooperate with the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) with regards to any individual that is taken into custody if the person is asseverately in the United States chthonian the premise on infringing active United States immigration laws. Advocates of the Arizona law aver that the basis of the law in the state simply follows the gist of existing Federal statutes regarding illegal immigrants.Laws that have been implemented by the Federal government for the past 7 decades. The text of the California section reads as follows With respect to any much(prenominal) person who is arrested, and suspected of being present in the United Sta tes in violation of federal immigration laws, e very law enforcement agency shall do the following (1) Attempt to verify the legal side of such person as a citizen of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted as a permanent resident, an alien lawfully admitted for a temporary period of time or as an alien who is present in the United States in violation of immigration laws.The verification process may include, but shall not be limited to, questioning the person regarding his or her date and position of birth, and entry into the United States, and demanding documentation to indicate his or her legal status (Dennis Romero). George Orwell, author of such works as Animal Farm and 1984, states that one of the great tragedies in crafting such important legislation, is that thousands of dollars in taxpayers money are wasted in crafting these laws.Many eagerly anticipate for the passage of the law, then downgrade the importance of actually enforcing the law itself. In the time that th e debate on the need of the law in the first place, the very thing that the law was crafted for in the first place remains and grows, nice part and parcel of the life of the society.Until such time that the issue has become too damaging to the society, it is only in that time that the law will be once again resurrected to address the problem, which could have been addressed if the law was oblige earlier (Arizona Immigration Laws). The law that empowered the INS/BICE to enforce the laws on immigration was originally crafted by the United States Congress, with both houses giving hale support to the immigration bills, as the laws were enacted in the early years of the twentieth century.The laws against illegal immigration were rendered to the hands of the President of the United States, with the belief that the executive branch will be able to faithfully execute the tenets of the law. The enforcement of the laws went swimmingly until the 1960s, when the implementation of the civil r ights laws in the United States and the rigorous enforcement of the laws regulating Latino immigration into America found themselves at loggerheads in the political circle.Unfortunately, the law against the entry of illegal immigrants coming from the southern American neighbors, particularly Latino immigrants, was overthrown to accommodate the caprices of United States Democrat senators, caring more for the support of the sufficient farmers in their constituencies than assuring that the laws against the entry of illegal immigrants into the United States was conscientiously enforced (Arizona).But are immigrants actually those that are in violation of United States immigration laws? According to Dr. Weissinger (2003), those that violate immigration laws are not considered as immigrants. In his opinion, there is a wide degree of differentiation against those that volitionally infringe on the laws of the United States, and those immigrants that apply for residency in the United Stat es, faithfully complying with the many requirements needed to gain legal citizenship in the United States.The confusion between the deuce contributes to the il system of logical responses and connotations attached to the illegal issue and picturing these two as equal issues is the result of dubious logic (Weissinger). The emphasis of the current administration on the strict, unyielding enforcement of the immigration laws has given(p) way to a increased number of fares by the BICE.In the program line of ICE assistant secretary John Morton, ICE is expected to find the needed resources and logistics that will allow the agency to deport more than 400,000 illegal immigrants in 2010. This figure, according to Morton, is an increase of 10 percent over the figures post the previous year. In addition, increasing numbers of raids on companies and businesses that are allegedly contracting the services of illegal immigrants have registered an increase of nearly quadruplet times than the ent ire administration of former President George W.Bush. In the bidding of the ICE, the priority of the agency is the location, arrest and eventual deportation of convicted criminals and other lawless elements in the United States illegally (Jurist Legal brisks and Research Services, Inc. ). The section of Homeland Security is besides fine tuning its resources intended to enforce Federal immigration laws, revising its 287g program, that gave a mandate to local police authorities to implement immigration statutes, which is considered one of the more disputable aspects of American border policy.But critics of the program aver that the program, originally intended to ascertain the identity of criminals in the United States in violation of immigration laws, has led to racial profiling by the police authorities in the areas where immigrants abound. They aver that the law gave the power to law enforcement authorities to arrest illegal immigrants even om such minor citations as a broken tail light. But many of the supporters aver the efficaciousness of the program, saying the program has become an powerful bastard in addressing the problem of illegal immigration (Miriam Jordan).In the new policy to be released by the DHS, the powers of the police to interrogate and arrest illegal immigrants, with the intent of preventing sheriff and police personnel to accost suspected illegal immigrants on the premise that they have violated some fictitious infarction as a means of initiating deportation proceedings against the individual. In the last two years, according to the data released by the Homeland Security Department, approximately 120,000 alleged illegal immigrants were identified with the use of the program, with the majority of the cases ending in deportation of the suspected illegal immigrant.Arpaio, one of the staunchest supporters of the Arizona illegal immigrants law, is also considered one of the most active enforcers of the program on the local level. But th e Maricopa sheriff is under investigation by no less than the United States Department of Justice, investigate claims that Maricopa sheriff deputies have utilized skin color as a motion to detain Hispanics that they believe are illegal immigrants (Jordan). With approximately 10. 8 gazillion illegal immigrants in the United States, the issue of immigration is considered to be one of the most heavily debated issues in the United States.The Arizona statute, regarded as the harshest measure enacted by a state in recent history against the problem of illegal immigrants, requires that local police establish the fact that a person is an illegal immigrant, that they have logical basis to do so, and to place under police custody those individuals who fail to prove or to present documents that they are in the United States legally. Under the law, the acts of transporting an illegal immigrant and to hire day laborers are also penalized.In the opinion of Senator Pearce, he believes that hand cuffs, used on the right individuals, can be considered as an effective crime fighting tool (Tim Gaynor, David Schwartz). At present, there is a large number of undocumented illegal immigrants in the United States. Spread across such states as California, New Mexico, Arizona, and Texas, the number of illegal immigrants, those that are here to find work and also those who are in America for more nefarious ends, continues to expand collect to the reluctance of the Federal government to adequately and faithfully enforce United States laws on illegal immigration.As such, they are becoming burdensome on the systems of the United States health care, welfare, education, employment and other programs of the Federal government, resources that should have been used for those that are in the United States legally and for its citizens (Arizona). Works Cited Arizona Immigration Law. The Dilemma of misappropriated Immigrtion Enforcment of Current Federal/ State Laws versus Reform. Gaynor, Tim, Schwartz, David. Arizona passes tough illegal immigration law. Harris, Craig, Rau, Alia Beard, Creno, Glen, Arizona govenor signs immigration law foes promise fight. Arizona Republic. 24 April 2010. Jordan, Miriam. New Curbs Set on Arrests of Illegal Immigrants. Wall Street Journal 11 July 2009. Jurist Legal intelligence and Research Services, Inc. US government increasing enforcement of immigration laws report. Romero, Dennis. Californias Illegal-Immigration Enforcement Law is Tougher than Arizonas. Thornburgh, Nathan. Arizona Police check on Immigration Crackdown. Time Magazine 30 April 2010. Weissinger, George, Ph. D. The Illegal disaffect Problem Enforcing the Immigration Laws.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment